Datagrid, a Procore Company
Pricing
Request a Demo
LoginCreate Account
Datagrid, a Procore Company

Subscribe to our newsletter

By subscribing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Product

  • Product
  • Agents
  • Integrations
  • Pricing
  • Download

Resources

  • Guides
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Release Notes
  • FAQ
  • Brand Assets

Get Help

  • Help Center
  • API Quickstart
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Company

  • Careers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Legal Terms
  • Credit Usage Policy and Pricing Terms
  • Report a Vulnerability

© 2026 Datagrid, a Procore company. All rights reserved.

Use Case

Automate Submittal Review with AI

ProductAgentsUse CasesAutomate Submittal Review with AI

On this page

Job to Be DoneThe Operational ProblemHow It WorksInputs & OutputsWorkflow ContextWorks WithFAQGet Started

The Summary Spec Submittal Agent compares submittals against applicable spec sections, flags missing items and misalignments, and delivers compliance summaries before formal design team review.

➡️

Try the Summary Spec Submittal Agent

Compare submittals against specifications to quickly identify compliance gaps and reduce review risk.

Use Agent →

The Operational Problem

Specs live in one location, submittals arrive from another, and drawings sit somewhere else. Project engineers cross-check manually against applicable spec sections. Volume pressure hits hardest during early procurement surges, when review capacity is thinnest.

Missed discrepancies become resubmittals and restart the review clock. Design teams receive packages with gaps that should have been caught before transmission. The Summary Spec Submittal Agent executes that cross-check before design team review, flags gaps, and documents discrepancies so PEs and PMs stay focused on engineering judgment and final approval decisions.

How Summary Spec Submittal Agent Automates This

The AI agent executes submittal cross-checking before the package reaches the design team. It compares project files across specs, drawings, RFIs, and submitted content, then delivers a structured compliance summary for technical review.

1

Ingest project specifications, submittals, and supporting files

Reads applicable spec sections alongside submitted product data, shop drawings, and manufacturer documentation. Cross-references related drawings and RFIs for complete project context before beginning the compliance comparison.

2

Compare submittal content against specification requirements

Evaluates what the spec requires versus what the submittal actually provides, checking performance data, material properties, compliance criteria, and referenced standards across each applicable section.

3

Flag missing items, misalignments, and critical discrepancies

Surfaces gaps where submittal content does not address spec requirements, identifies misalignments between submitted products and specified criteria, and documents critical discrepancies that require resolution before formal review.

4

Generate a compliance summary and checklist for technical review

Assembles a structured compliance summary and checklist documenting conformance status, outstanding gaps, and discrepancies, ready for PE or PM review before the package reaches the design team.

Inputs & Outputs

Inputs

  • Project specifications and applicable spec sections, including performance requirements, material standards, and compliance criteria organized by division

  • Submittals including shop drawings, product data sheets, and manufacturer cut sheets provided by the contractor or subcontractor

  • Related construction drawings referenced in or adjacent to the submittal package

  • RFIs (Requests for Information) that clarify or modify specification requirements relevant to the submittal under review

  • Supporting files including addenda, supplementary conditions, and other referenced project files

Outputs

  • Concise compliance summary documenting conformance status for each applicable spec section, identifying where the submittal meets, partially meets, or fails to address requirements

  • Structured compliance checklist mapping each specification requirement to corresponding submittal content, with clear conformance indicators per item

  • Itemized identification of missing items where spec requirements are not addressed anywhere in the submittal package

  • Documentation of misalignments and critical discrepancies between submitted product data and specified performance criteria, material standards, or dimensional requirements

Workflow Context

Automated submittal compliance checking sits between submittal receipt and design team review, the GC-side pre-review step teams often skip under volume pressure. The Summary Spec Submittal Agent executes this step systematically and delivers packages into the formal review queue with gaps already documented. That connection matters because submittal review affects procurement release timing for long-lead items and can trigger RFIs when discrepancies require design clarification.

Works With

The Summary Spec Submittal Agent connects to the project systems teams already use to assemble, compare, and route submittal packages.

S

Submittal management systems

Ingest submittal packages and related project records for compliance cross-checking before the package moves into formal design review.

D

Drawing repositories

Cross-check related construction drawings against specification requirements and adjacent drawing context.

F

File storage platforms

Access specifications, supporting files, and other referenced project files required for submittal compliance review.

P

Project collaboration systems

Compare drawings and supporting project files against applicable specification sections.

P

Project record systems

Route associated documentation through the pre-review compliance checking workflow.

These systems connect the same pre-review objective: giving project teams more complete packages for compliance checking before design-team transmission.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Summary Spec Submittal Agent searches deeply across specs, drawings, RFIs, and submittals to compare what the specification requires against what the submittal actually provides. It cross-references performance criteria, material standards, and referenced specifications to flag gaps and discrepancies. The output is a compliance summary and checklist that documents exactly where the submittal falls short, so project engineers can address issues and repackage before transmitting to the design team for formal review.

No. The agent executes the manual cross-referencing and project file comparison work that consumes technical review hours: line-by-line spec lookup, gap identification, and checklist assembly. PEs and PMs retain full authority over engineering decisions, approval actions, and professional judgment calls. The agent delivers a structured compliance summary that makes the reviewer's time count while preserving the technical decision where it belongs.

The agent compares submitted product data, performance characteristics, and material specifications against the applicable spec sections requirement by requirement. When a submittal omits data the spec explicitly requires, or when submitted values deviate from specified criteria, the agent flags the item as missing or misaligned in the compliance checklist. This catches substitutions that might otherwise pass through under time pressure, when reviewers lack bandwidth for thorough technical comparison against every specified parameter.

The agent ingests the full project context: specifications, drawings, RFIs, and supporting files, then searches across all relevant sections simultaneously. When a submittal package spans multiple spec divisions or requires cross-reference against construction drawings for dimensional or spatial verification, the agent compares across those sources rather than reviewing against a single section in isolation. Discrepancies between the submittal and any referenced file surface in the compliance summary.

Resubmittals occur when packages reach the design team with gaps, missing items, or non-conforming content, restarting the full review clock each time. The agent identifies these deficiencies before transmission by generating a compliance checklist that maps every spec requirement to corresponding submittal content. Project teams address flagged items before the package enters the formal review queue, increasing the likelihood of first-cycle approval and keeping procurement timelines intact for downstream fabrication and delivery.

Automate Submittal Review with Agentic AI

The Summary Spec Submittal Agent compares submittals against applicable spec sections, flags missing items and misalignments, and delivers compliance summaries before formal design team review.

Try Agent

Agent

➡️

Summary Spec Submittal Agent

Compare submittals against specifications to quickly identify compliance gaps and reduce review risk.

Works with

ProcoreProcorePlanGridPlanGridSharePointSharePointSlackSlackTrimble ConnectTrimble Connect
Use Agent

Learn More

Related Guides

Product Data Submittal Examples That Pass Review
Guide 012 agents

Product Data Submittal Examples That Pass Review

See product data submittal examples across CSI Divisions 05–26. Learn what triggers rejections and how to catch compliance gaps before review.

Read
What Is a Submittal in Construction and How AI Agents Are Reshaping the Workflow
Guide 023 agents

What Is a Submittal in Construction and How AI Agents Are Reshaping the Workflow

Learn what construction submittals are, where workflows break, and how AI agents flag spec gaps, missing certifications, and scope conflicts early.

Read
MEP Construction Meaning: A GC's Guide to Scope, Trade Boundaries, and Validation
Guide 033 agents

MEP Construction Meaning: A GC's Guide to Scope, Trade Boundaries, and Validation

MEP covers mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Learn how GCs can validate scope across trade boundaries before disputes start.

Read

You've got more important things to do. Let Datagrid handle the rest.

Watch our quick demo to see how Datagrid transforms workflows. Discover the seamless integration of our AI assistants in real-time tasks.

Use AgentLearn More